Microstructure formation of the nickel-based superalloy ABD900 after LPBF and its comparison with Inconel 718
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-3-164-2026-26Keywords:
LPBF, nickel superalloys, ABD900, Inconel 718, microstructure, porosityAbstract
The paper presents the results of a study on microstructure formation and a comparative analysis of the nickel-based superalloys ABD900 and Inconel 718 manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). In recent years, additive manufacturing technologies have been increasingly applied in high-tech industries due to their ability to produce components with complex geometries and high-performance characteristics. However, the use of conventional high-temperature alloys, originally developed for casting or thermomechanical processing, in additive manufacturing processes may be associated with several technological limitations, including cracking, porosity, and microstructural instability. In this context, considerable attention has been devoted to the development of new alloys specifically optimized for additive manufacturing. One such material is the nickel-based superalloy ABD900, developed using the Alloy By Design approach and intended for LPBF applications. A comparative analysis of porosity revealed that samples of Inconel 718 are characterized by pores predominantly in the range of 2–10 μm, with maximum sizes reaching 12–14 μm, whereas the ABD900 alloy exhibits an overall lower porosity. The pore sizes in ABD900 are mainly within the range of 2–12 μm, and no isolated larger pores were observed compared to the Inconel 718 samples. Microstructural analysis demonstrated the formation of a characteristic melt track morphology typical for the LPBF process. In the Inconel 718 samples, a more pronounced cellular-dendritic solidification structure was observed, whereas in the ABD900 alloy, certain regions of the microstructure are characterized by the formation of a fine cellular γ-Ni matrix. The obtained results confirm the potential of ABD900 for additive manufacturing applications and highlight the specific features of its microstructure formation in comparison with Inconel 718.
References
Blakey-Milner B., Gradl P., Snedden G., Brooks M., Pitot J., Lopez E., Leary M., Berto F., du Plessis A. (2021). Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Materials & De-sign. 209, 110008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008
Kennedy S. M., Vasanthanathan A., Amudhan K. (2024). Exploring the frontiers of metal additive manufacturing in orthopaedic implant development. MethodsX. 13, 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103056
Reed R.C., Tao T., Warnken N. (2009). Alloys-By-Design: Application to nickel-based single crystal superalloys. Acta Materialia. 57, 19, 5898-5913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.018
Tang Y.T., Panwisawas C., Ghoussoub J. N., Gong Y., Clark J. W.G, Németh A. A.N., McCartney D. G., Reed R. C. (2021). Alloys-by-design: Application to new superalloys for additive manufacturing. Acta Materialia. 202, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.023
Bridges A., Shingledecker J., Hussain Z., Forster J., Nemeth A., Vogel G., O’Nora N. (2024). Acceleration of Material Acceptance and Industry Adoption of an Additively Manu-factured Nickel-base Superalloy. Proceedings of the AM-EPRI 2024. Advances in Materials, Manufacturing, and Repair for Power Plants: Proceedings from the Tenth International Con-ference. Indian Wells, California, USA. 74-87. ASM. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.am-epri-2024p0074
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 System technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









