Method for assessing the condition of an engineering structure element using explanatory artificial intelligence and multimodal data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-3-164-2026-17Keywords:
explanatory artificial intelligence, feature engineering, multimodal data processing, image processing, intelligent monitoring, ML classification, risk analysis, surface defects, crackAbstract
Assessing the technical condition of engineering structural elements is an important task for ensuring operational safety, reliability, and timely maintenance. Conventional inspection approaches are often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and dependent on expert judgment. This study proposes an intelligent approach for structural condition assessment based on machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) using multimodal data that combine visual and environmental information. In the developed approach, the condition of a structural surface is evaluated using three input features: the defect area ratio (DefectRatio), humidity, and temperature. Based on these features, the structural state is automatically classified into three condition categories: Normal, Warning, and Critical. To solve the classification task, several machine learning algorithms were investigated, including Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression, with the application of hyperparameter optimization and cross-validation. Experimental results showed that Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest classification accuracy on the test dataset (0.90), while Logistic Regression, SVM, and LightGBM demonstrated lower performance, with accuracies of 0.80, 0.70, and 0.60, respectively. The obtained results indicate that the selected feature set is sufficiently informative for distinguishing between different structural condition states, while also revealing differences in the generalization ability of the investigated models. To improve transparency and interpretability, the proposed approach incorporates explainable artificial intelligence techniques, including Permutation Importance, SHAP-based analysis, and rule-based explanations. These methods made it possible to identify the most influential features and explain the reasoning behind model predictions. The analysis confirmed that DefectRatio is the dominant factor in structural condition assessment, whereas humidity and temperature play a supporting contextual role. The proposed approach was implemented in Python using libraries such as NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, Scikit-learn, XGBoost, LightGBM, and SHAP. The obtained results demonstrate the feasibility of combining machine learning, multimodal analysis, and XAI for interpretable and automated structural condition monitoring, which can be useful for preventive diagnostics, risk assessment, and decision support in engineering applications..
References
Mysiuk, R., Yuzevych, V., Mysiuk, I., Tyrkalo, Y., Pavlenchyk, A., & Dalyk, V. (2023). Detection of surface defects inside concrete pipelines using trained model on JetRacer kit. In 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT) (pp. 21–24). IEEE., doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ELIT61488.2023.10310691
Mysiuk, R., Mysiuk, I., Pawlowski, G., Yuzevych, V., Yasinskyi, M., & Tyrkalo, Y. (2023). Video-based concrete road damage assessment using JetRacer kit. In 2023 17th Inter-national Conference on the Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems (CADSM) (pp. 1–4). IEEE., doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CADSM58174.2023.10076528.
Mysiuk, R. (2024). Towards Information Flows in Recognition and Prediction Tasks with Internet of Things. Path of Science, 10(1),1001-1004.doi: https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.100-10
Mysiuk, R., & Yuzevych, V. (2023). IoT-based solution for detection defects in infrastruc-ture objects using Raspberry Pi. Electronics and Information Technologies, 21, 45–56.. 10.30970/eli.21.5
Moreh, F., Lyu, H., Rizvi, Z. H., et al. (2024). Deep neural networks for crack detection inside structures. Scientific Reports, 14, 4439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54494-y
Shalaby, Y. M., Badawy, M., Ebrahim, G. A., et al. (2024). Condition assessment of con-crete structures using automated crack detection method for different concrete surface types based on image processing. Discover Civil Engineering, 1, 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00089-5
Roy, S., Yogi, B., Majumdar, R., et al. (2025). Deep learning-based crack detection and prediction for structural health monitoring. Discover Applied Sciences, 7, 674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07272-y
Shah Mansouri, T., Lubarsky, G., Finlay, D., & McLaughlin, J. (2024). Machine learning-based structural health monitoring technique for crack detection and localisation using Blue-tooth strain gauge sensor network. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 13(6), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan13060079
Barbosh, M., Ge, L., & Sadhu, A. (2024). Automated crack identification in structures us-ing acoustic waveforms and deep learning. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resil-ience, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-024-00102-2
Spencer, B. F., Sim, S.-H., Kim, R. E., & Yoon, H. (2025). Advances in artificial intelli-gence for structural health monitoring: A comprehensive review. KSCE Journal of Civil En-gineering, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100203
Si, H., Wang, Q., Ruan, X., et al. (2025). Framework for investigating structure cracking using real engineering data combined with physics constraints. Scientific Reports, 15, 6344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-85079-4
Sun, Z., Chen, T., Meng, X., Bao, Y., Hu, L., & Zhao, R. (2023). A critical review for trustworthy and explainable structural health monitoring and risk prognosis of bridges with human-in-the-loop. Sustainability, 15(8), 6389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086389
Chen, Q., & Li, B. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-driven probabilistic image-based structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete beams with shear reinforce-ments. Automation in Construction, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106549
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 System technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









