Innovative approaches to assessing the efficiency of material technologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-2-163-2026-02

Keywords:

integral efficiency index, material technologies, materials science, criteria normalization, structural-phase state, physical and mechanical properties, resource efficiency, environmental assessment, digital models, selection of technological regimes

Abstract

The article addresses the problem of comprehensive efficiency assessment of material production and modification technologies in modern manufacturing conditions. The increas-ing complexity of technological processes, the expansion of additive and hybrid manufactur-ing, and the growing requirements for sustainable development necessitate the integration of technical, economic, resource, and environmental criteria within a unified analytical frame-work. The purpose of the study is to develop an applied approach to evaluating the efficiency of material technologies that ensures a well-grounded selection of technological regimes and improves production performance through the systematization and integration of heterogene-ous indicators.
The paper systematizes contemporary methodological approaches to technology as-sessment, including process-oriented, structural-phase, functional-operational, resource-economic, life cycle (LCA), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Based on the concept “process – structure – properties – performance,” a structured system of criteria is proposed, grouped into structural, physical-mechanical, technological, resource, and envi-ronmental blocks. To enable quantitative comparison of alternative technological solutions, the study introduces an integral efficiency index calculated as a weighted sum of normalized criteria. 
The applicability of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a comparative evaluation of alternative processing regimes, illustrating how the integral index reveals hid-den advantages associated with reduced energy consumption and improved environmental performance. The developed methodological framework can be implemented in industrial practice as a decision-support tool and integrated into digital production management sys-tems. The approach contributes to enhancing the transparency, consistency, and economic justification of technological choice in the context of digitalization and sustainable manufac-turing.

References

"1. Sharko, O., Stepanchykov, D., Sharko, A., Yanenko, A., & Movchan, P. (2024). Zastosu-vannia bahatokryterialnoho analizu pry doslidzhenni termodynamichnykh protsesiv u sud-noremonti ta transportnii infrastrukturi [Application of multi-criteria analysis in the study of thermodynamic processes in ship repair and transport infrastructure]. Naukovyi visnyk Kher-sonskoi derzhavnoi morskoi akademii [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State Maritime Acad-emy], № 1 (28), pp. 117–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33815/2313-4763.2024.1.28.117-132 [in Ukrainian].

Vrublevskyi, I., Stupnytskyy, V., & She, X. (2025). Technical and economic analysis of the alternative application of additive, subtractive, and hybrid technologies for the manufacture of complex-profile mechanical engineering products: Systematic review. Ukrainian Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Vol. 11, № 4, pp. 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/ujmems2025.04.083.

Avramova, T. (2025). Overview of existing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) meth-ods used in industrial environments. Technologies, Vol. 13, pp. 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13040444.

Rintala, A. (2025). Estimating the economic feasibility of additive manufacturing: A sys-tematic literature review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 31, № 11, pp. 301–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2024-0340.

Popowicz, M., Katzer, N. J., Kettele, M., Schöggl, J.-P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2025). Digital technologies for life cycle assessment: A review and integrated combination frame-work. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 30, pp. 405–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02409-4.

Kokare, S., Oliveira, J. P., & Godina, R. (2023). Life cycle assessment of additive manu-facturing processes: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 68, pp. 536–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.007.

Pacana, A., & Siwiec, D. (2025). Method of material selection considering quality, envi-ronmental, and cost aspects. Materials, Vol. 18, pp. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184324.

Kozłowska, J. (2022). Methods of multi-criteria analysis in technology selection and tech-nology assessment: A systematic literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, Vol. 14, № 2, pp. 116–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0021.

Junaid, M., Khaleeq uz Zaman, U., Naseem, A., Ahmad, Y., & Bin Aqeel, A. (2024). Ma-terial selection in additive manufacturing for aerospace applications using multi-criteria deci-sion making. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 398, pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439801012."

Published

2026-03-31