Application of machine learning methods in the processing of 3D seismic images

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-5-162-2026-25

Keywords:

machine learning, deep learning, 3D seismic data, convolutional neural networks, ge-ophysical interpretation, fault detection, Python, SEGY

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive technical review of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods applied to 3D seismic image analysis in geophysical exploration. The exponential growth in seismic data acquisition has created a "big data" challenge where single 3D surveys generate terabytes of complex volumetric data, making traditional manual interpretation increasingly impractical and subjective. This work systematically examines the paradigm shift from hypothesis-driven manual interpretation to data-driven automated pat-tern recognition, addressing the critical need for more efficient, objective, and repeatable an-alytical tools in the energy sector, environmental monitoring, and geological risk assessment.
The paper provides an in-depth analysis of state-of-the-art neural network architectures and their specific applications in seismic interpretation. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and U-Net architectures are examined for their effectiveness in fault detection, achieving clean, consistent results in hours compared to months of manual work. Advanced architectures like TransUnet and Dual U-Net are explored for their ability to capture both local and global geological features. The study covers supervised learning approaches for lithofacies classification and stratigraphic interpretation, as well as unsupervised methods combining Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) for ex-ploratory analysis in data-limited regions.
Significant emphasis is placed on practical implementation challenges and solutions. The paper details workflows for handling SEGY format data using Python ecosystems (segyio, segysak with xarray and dask), strategies for multi-attribute analysis, and approaches to overcome the critical bottleneck of labeled training data scarcity through synthetic data gen-eration, augmentation techniques, and utilization of public datasets (F3, FORCE, TerraNu-bis). Emerging research frontiers are thoroughly discussed, including self-supervised learn-ing (SSL) for leveraging unlabeled data, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for in-corporating domain knowledge, and uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for assessing model confidence.

References

3-D Seismic Interpretation. M. Bacon, R. Simm, T. Redshaw, Cambridge University Press, 2003

Fault detection seismic data using graph convolutional network. Patitapaban Palo, Auro-binda Routray, Rahul Mahadik, Sanjai Kumar Singh, The Journal of Supercomputing, 03.2023, DOI:10.1007/s11227-023-05173-8

Introduction to Seismic Imaging. Prof. Gerald Gardner, Society of Exploration Geophysi-cists

Discovering hidden hydrocarbons: using seismic-imaging technology to map formations far below the earth’s surface. ExxonMobil, 09.2018

Introduction to seismic data and processing. Cambridge University Press, Hua-Wei Zhou

Solving the challenge of seismic data management. SLB, Victor Aarre

Sebai, D., Zouaoui, M. & Ghorbel, F. Seismic data compression: an overview. Multimedia Systems 30, 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-023-01233-4

Pitfalls and limitations in seismic attribute interpretation of tectonic features. SEG Library, Kurt J. Marfurt, Tiago M. Alves, doi.org/10.1190/INT-2014-0122.1

Lappin, M. (2004). 3D Seismic Technology: Are We Realising Its Full Potential?. Geo-logical Society, London, Memoirs. Geological Society of London. doi: 10.1144/GSL.MEM.2004.029.01.01.

Machine learning for seismic exploration: Where are we and how far are we from the ho-ly grail? Farbod Khosro Anjom, Francesco Vaccarino, Laura Valentina Socco, GEOPHYSICS - SEG Library, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0129.1

Seismic facies analysis using machine learning. Thilo Wrona, Indranil Pan, Robert L. Gawthorpe, and Haakon Fossen, GEOPHYSICS - SEG Library, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0595.1

Unravel Complex Strike-Slip System in Frontier Collision Margin of Banggai-Sula Ba-sin, Eastern Indonesia: A Machine-Learning Augmentation for 3D Seismic Interpretation. Atha Khawarizmy, Fakhriar Naufaldi, Krishna Pratama Laya, Wahyudin Suwarlan, Iswani Waryono, Ghufron Fauzi, OB Pertamina Medco Tomori Ltd, 2 Pi Energy, Badley Geoscience

Machine learning for seismic exploration: Where are we and how far are we from the ho-ly grail? Farbod Khosro Anjom, Francesco Vaccarino, Laura Valentina Socco, GeoScience-World, Geophysics, vol. 89, no. 1 (january-february 2024); p. wa157–wa178, 17 figs., 2 ta-bles.10.1190/geo2023-0129.1

Seismic Fault Detection using Neural Networks. GeoConvention, Ayda Azad Khorasani, J.Kim Welford, Alison Malcolm, Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 05.2023

Comparing Modern Deep Learning with Traditional Methods for Seismic Fault Interpre-tation. N. Ngcobo, M. Manzi, G. Nwaila, J. Bourdeau, S. Zhang, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, NSG 2024 5th Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining, Sep 2024, Volume 2024, p.1 – 5, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202420194

Artificial intelligence methods for predicting hydrocarbon deposits from three-dimensional seismic images. I. Dmytriieva, A. Dmytrenko, System technologies, 2025, https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-4-159-2025-16

Published

2026-03-03