Methodology for data fusion of multichannel images

Authors

  • V. Hnatushenko
  • D. Hryshchak
  • Yu. Olevska
  • V. Olevsky
  • I. Udovyk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-5-161-2025-16

Keywords:

multichannel images, preprocessing, spectral analysis, machine learning

Abstract

Relevance of the research topic. In modern research and practical application of multi-channel images obtained from various sources, such as aerospace sensors and medical imag-ing systems, there is a need for effective data fusion. In the aerospace industry, combining images with different spectral characteristics provides more accurate information about Earth's surface. In the medical field, integrating images of different modalities helps improve diagnostic accuracy. However, these processes are complicated by differences in spatial resolution, scale, spectral ranges, and noise characteristics of the data.
Problem statement. It is necessary to develop a method for combining images with dif-ferent spectral characteristics to obtain more accurate information about the Earth's surface and medical objects.
Research goal and methods. The goal is to develop and improve a method for combining multi-channel images to improve the accuracy of analysis, increase information content and reduce the impact of noise. The proposed method is based on the use of mathematical models for harmonizing heterogeneous data, including algorithms for preliminary preprocessing, spectral analysis and machine learning. The adaptation of approaches for specific tasks is considered: combining remote sensing data of the Earth for cartographic analysis and merging medical images of different modalities (for example, MRI, CT and ultrasound) for diagnostic purposes.
Results and key conclusions. The developed methodology is universal and can be applied in many areas, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, medical diagnostics, and robotics. The proposed methodology is based on the use of mathematical models to harmonize heterogeneous data and includes preliminary preprocessing, spectral analysis and machine learning. The approaches are adapted for combining remote sensing data of the Earth and fusing medical images for diagnostic purposes. The experiments conducted demonstrate an increase in the quality of the results when using the proposed approach. The results obtained confirm that the integration of multi-channel images allows us to achieve better detail, reduce object identification errors and provide more accurate visualization. The developed methodology is universal and can be applied in many areas, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, medical diagnostics and robotics.

References

Gonzalez, R.C. and Woods, R.E. (2018). Digital Image Processing. 4th Edition, Pearson Education, New York, 1022 p. ISBN 10: 1-292-22304-9

Richards, J. A., & Jia, X. (2020). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, 363 p. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature. Vol 521. pp. 436-444. DOI:10.1038/nature14539

Jain, A. K. (1989). Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall. 565 p. ISBN 0-13-336165-9

Balakrishnan, R. and Priya, R. (2018). Multimodal Medical Image Fusion Using Various Hybrid Fusion Techniques for Clinical Treatment Analysis. Smart Construction Research. Vol 2. pp. 1–20. DOI:10.18063/scr.v2i4.594

Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Bio-medical Image Segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W., Frangi, A. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 9351. Springer, Cham, pp. 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. (2003). Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press. 655 p. ISBN 0-521-54051-8.

Faugeras, O., Luong, Q.-T., and Papadopoulo, T. (2001). The Geometry of Multiple Im-ages. MIT Press, London. 644 p. ISBN 0-262-06220-8.

Ma, Y., Sastry, S., Kosecka, J., Soatto, S. (2003). An Invitation to 3-D Vision: From Im-ages to Geometric Models. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics Series, No 26, pp. 1-325. Springer-Verlag New York, LLC. ISBN 0-387-00893-4

Shapiro, L., Stockman, G. (2001). Computer Vision. Prentice Hall. 580 p. ISBN 0-13-030796-3.

Lowe, D. (2004). Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. Interna-tional Journal of Computer Vision. Vol 60, pp. 91-110.

DOI:10.1023/B%3AVISI.0000029664.99615.94

Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L. (2006). SURF: Speeded up robust features. Computer Vision-ECCV 2006. Vol 3951, pp. 404-417. DOI:10.1007/11744023_32

Olevskyi, V., Olevska, Yu., Olevskyi, O., and Hnatushenko, V. (2023). Raster image processing using 2D Padé-type approximations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol 2675, paper 012015. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2675/1/012015

Fischler, M. A., Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, Vol 24(6), pp. 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/358669.358692

Dubins L. E. On curves of Minimal Length with a Constraint on Average Curvature, and with Prescribed Initial and Terminal Positions and Tangents. American Journal of Mathematics, 1957. Vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 497–516.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2372560?origin=crossref

Babaei A., Mortazavi M. Three-Dimensional Curvature-Constrained Trajectory Plan-ning Based on In-Flight Waypoints. Journal of Aircraft, 2010. Vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1391-1398. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47711

Published

2025-12-05