Methods for protecting and pseudonymizing personal data in systems for forming cross–functional IT project teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-5-166-2026-10Keywords:
computer systems, information technologies, data analysis, personal data protection, PII, pseudonymization, access control, DLP, machine learningAbstract
The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the security requirements, methods, and technological tools for protecting personal data in human resource management systems and systems for forming cross–functional teams for IT projects. The main categories of data used to create professional profiles are identified, including identification data, professional experience, hard skills, soft skills, roles, assessment results, and information about participation in previous projects. The principal risks associated with unauthorized access, data breaches, excessive user privileges, re–identification of data subjects, and the use of personal information beyond the specified purpose of processing are systematized. Organizational and procedural protection mechanisms, technical means of authentication and authorization, role–based and attribute–based access control models, the principle of least privilege, activity auditing, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) mechanisms, and tools for monitoring operations involving personal data are examined. A comparative analysis of the main methods for transforming and de–identifying Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including masking, tokenization, pseudonymization, anonymization, and differential privacy, is conducted with regard to the level of confidentiality, the possibility of controlled re–identification, preservation of data structure, suitability for further analysis, machine learning, and data mining (DM), as well as the complexity of practical implementation. The study demonstrates that, for potential candidate profiles, it is essential not only to reduce the risk of disclosing users’ identities but also to preserve the analytical value of professional and behavioral characteristics required for candidate assessment and support of personnel–related decisions. The feasibility of using pseudonymization as a basic mechanism for separating the identification and analytical data–processing layers is substantiated. A conceptual approach to the creation and evaluation of a protected professional profile is proposed, in which direct personal identifiers are removed from the analytical layer and replaced with controlled pseudonyms, while professional characteristics, skills, experience, and role–related attributes remain available to algorithms for analysis and team formation. Particular attention is paid to the automated detection of PII using rules, regular expressions, Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods, machine learning, and combined mechanisms for identifying sensitive attributes.
References
1. Álvarez–Gutiérrez, F. J., Stone, D. L., Castaño, A. M., & García–Izquierdo, A. L. (2022). Human resources analytics: A systematic review from a sustainable management approach. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 38(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a18.
2. Edwards, M. R., Charlwood, A., Guenole, N., & Marler, J. (2024). HR analytics: An emerging field finding its place in the world alongside simmering ethical challenges. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(2), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748–8583.12435.
3. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Siachou, E. (2022). Examining the dark side of human resource analytics: An empirical investigation using the privacy calculus approach. International Journal of Manpower, 43(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM–02–2021–0087.
4. Tall, A. M., & Zou, C. C. (2023). A framework for attribute–based access control in pro-cessing big data with multiple sensitivities. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021183.
5. Herrera Montano, I., García Aranda, J. J., Ramos Diaz, J., Molina Cardín, S., de la Torre Díez, I., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2022). Survey of techniques on data leakage protection and methods to address the insider threat. Cluster Computing, 25, 4289–4302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586–022–03668–2.
6. Weitzenboeck, E. M., Lison, P., Cyndecka, M., & Langford, M. (2022). The GDPR and unstructured data: Is anonymization possible? International Data Privacy Law, 12(3), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipac008.
7. Tomás, J., Rasteiro, D., & Bernardino, J. (2022). Data anonymization: An experimental evaluation using open–source tools. Future Internet, 14(6), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14060167.
8. Abu Attieh, H., Müller, A., Wirth, F. N., & Prasser, F. (2025). Pseudonymization tools for medical research: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 25, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911–025–02958–0.
9. Schneider, M. J., Bailie, J., & Iacobucci, D. (2025). Why data anonymization has not tak-en off. Customer Needs and Solutions, 12, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547–025–00158–5.
10. Mishra, K., Pagare, H., & Sharma, K. (2025). A hybrid rule–based NLP and machine learning approach for PII detection and anonymization in financial documents. Scientific Reports, 15, 22729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–025–04971–9.
11. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88.
12. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations (NIST Special Publication 800–53, Revision 5). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800–53r5.
13. Huang, W., Zhuo, M., Zhu, T., Zhou, S., & Liao, Y. (2023). Differential privacy: Review of improving utility through cryptography–based technologies. Concurrency and Computa-tion: Practice and Experience, 35(5), e7565. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7565.
14. Slavković, A., & Seeman, J. (2023). Statistical data privacy: A song of privacy and util-ity. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 10, 189–218.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–statistics–033121–112921.
15. Google Cloud. (2026). Sensitive Data Protection documentation. Google Cloud Documentation.
16. Google Cloud. (2026). De–identify and re–identify sensitive data. Google Cloud Documentation.
17. Sartor G., Lagioia F. (2020). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. European Parliamentary Research Service, Scientific Fore-sight Unit (STOA). PE 641.530. https://doi.org/10.2861/293. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/641530/EPRS_STU(2020)641530_EN.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 System technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









