Monitoring and evalution activities of NPP operators in the preparation for the training facilities

Authors

  • Oleksandr Illich Mikhalov
  • Oleksandr Afrykanovych Stenin
  • Iryna Hennadiivna Drozdovych
  • Serhii Oleksandrovych Stenin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-4-123-2019-07

Keywords:

оператор АЭС, тренажерный комплекс, «инициативная» и «запрещённая» комбинации, многоуровневый критерий контроля и оценки

Abstract

The most effective technical means of training operators of various kinds of professional activities are simulators. In recent years, simulators are increasingly used in industry, energy and other sectors of the economy, in particular, to train operators of nuclear power units, whose actions are characterized by the complexity of management tasks and greater responsibility for decisions. To provide the possibility of monitoring and evaluation of activities on training of NPP operators on training complexes. To do this, propose to present our work with a working model that reflects a consistent change in the current state of discrete controllers on the NPP console compared to the reference model of its activity. Based on this, propose to use a three-level structure of monitoring and evaluation criteria-"task-mode-parameter". According to the adopted structure, the lower level of the hierarchy is a criterion for assessing the activities of the operator by parameters, which in this case is the state of the controls in a separate mode. The method of evaluation and control of NPP operators ' activity during their training on training complexes based on the concepts of "initiative" and "forbidden" combinations introduced in the article in the transformation matrices characterizing the current activities of NPP operators is proposed.

References

Avaryy y yntsydentы na atomnыkh эlektrostantsyiakh. Uchebnoe poso-bye. / pod red. S.P. Soloveva. – Obnynsk, YATЭ, 1992. – 300 s.

Randall J. Mumaw, Emilie M. Roth, Kim J. Vicente, Catherine M. Burns There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye // Hu-man factors. 2000. Vol 42. – P. 36-55.

Hubynskyi A.Y. Nadezhnost y kachestvo funktsyonyrovanyia эrhaty-cheskykh system. – L.: «Nauka», 1982. – 270 s.

Zaitsev V.S. Systemnыi analyz operatorskoi deiatelnosty. – M.: Radyo y sviaz, 1990. – 120 s.

Shyrokova A.A. Osobennosty nepravylnыkh deistvyi y samokon-trolia v rabote personala atomnoi stantsyy // Problemы psykholohyy y эr-honomyky. – 2001. – №4. – S. 49-51.

Chachko A. H. Podhotovka operatorov эnerhoblokov: Alhorytmycheskyi podkhod. – M.: Эnerhoatomyzdat, 1986. – 232 s.

Shybanov H.P. Kolychestvennaia otsenka deiatelnosty cheloveka v sys-temakh «chelovek-tekhnyka» – M.: Mashynostroenye. - 1983. – 224s.

A.A. Stenyn, M.M. Tkach, A.N. Hubskyi, S.A. Stenyn Syntez yerarkhy-cheskoi strukturы kryteryev otsenky deiatelnosty operatorov slozhnыkh tekhnycheskykh system. –Visnyk NTUU KPI. - Informatyka ta obchysliuvalna tekhnika. - K.:Vek.-№57.-2012. - S. 60-64.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-12